Loading Quotes...

A couple of weeks ago I was waiting in an examination room along with my good friend Barb. My beloved yellow lab, Amber, was not doing well following a rather nasty seizure. She was 14 plus years old, so the prognosis was not good. My veterinarian, Dr. M, came in and began examining Amber. Amber was lying on the floor because her hindquarters were a bit wobbly. Dr. M ran a couple of neurological tests while also lying on the floor next to Amber. As Dr. M began to get up and assume a kneeling position, both Barb and I at almost the same time blurted out, “Duck, there’s an exam table above you.” Without even looking above herself, Dr. M smiled and simply said, “Thanks but I know all of these exam rooms.”

What did Dr. M mean when she said that she “knows” the exam rooms? That’s the topic of this blog post.

Read More→

Comments (0)

Welcome to part two. Let me see if I can get you up to speed. In part one I talked about two frames: digital skeptic and digital celebrant. Simply, digital skeptics view the rise of the digital age with a fair bit of caution and reserve. On the other hand, digital celebrants, well, celebrate the coming and arrival of the digital age. I first encountered these frames reading Robert McChesney’s 2013 book entitled Digital Disconnect—How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet Against Democracy. In his book McChesney credits Robin Mansell with developing these frames. McChesney argues that the conflict between the digital skeptic frame and the digital celebrant frame essentially gives rise to what could be called a “Straw Man fallacy.” Such a fallacy, argues McChesney, takes light off the real conflict: Internet monopolists, like Zuckerberg, Gates, the late Jobs, and Schmidt (of Google fame), are “marketizing” or monetizing the Internet and, as a result, are killing any potential the Internet may provide as far as revitalizing democracy.

Well, OK, but in part one I argue that the frames digital skeptic and digital celebrant are misleading and do not appropriately convey what is really going on as we continue to go through a huge paradigm shift: moving from a human state to a posthuman state. Here are the frames that I propose and my reason for proposing them.

Read More→

Comments (0)

OK, pop quiz:

Are you …

a) a digital celebrant
b) a digital skeptic
c) both a digital celebrant and skeptic
d) none of the above
e) confused because you have no clue what I’m talking about

If you answered anything but “e”, then more than likely you are familiar with the frames digital celebrant and digital skeptic. But if you answered “e”, more than likely you have never heard of these frames before. Well, until I read Robert McChesney’s 2013 book entitled Digital Disconnect—How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet Against Democracy, I would have answered “e”. For those of you who answered “e”, lets take a look at where these frames came from and what they’re about. In the process I’ll challenge these frames and offer up what I consider to be more accurate and revealing frames. As always, cognitive scientist (turned political commentator) George Lakoff’s work in the area of frames (especially political frames) will provide the theoretical scaffolding.

Read More→

Comments (0)

The following is a listing of the grants approved by the board at the FHL Foundation’s spring board meeting on April 30th, 2013:

1) Syracuse University (Dr. Ken Corvo, lead researcher) – $15,000

DESCRIPTION – (From Dr. Corvo’s Full Proposal narrative) For nearly 40 years, the public policy response to the problem of domestic violence has been defined as the socially sanctioned dominance of women by men. This view of patriarchy as the sole cause of domestic violence is the underpinning for a policy/practice paradigm that has dominated the regulatory, legal, and policy discourse of the United States, Canada and other countries. In spite of a robust and rigorous literature indicating a much broader range of psychological risk factors, policies regarding the etiology and treatment of domestic violence perpetration often disregard or forbid considerations of mental health issues, particularly those with developmental antecedents. Instead, a model of psychoeducation is substituted, based upon an ideological interpretation of domestic violence as only resulting from the socially-sanctioned domination of women by men.

The literature contains numerous studies of psychopathology and neuropsychological issues in domestic violence perpetration, including perpetrator typologies, correlational studies between specific mental disorders and perpetration, links to substance abuse/dependence, and neurological deficits (e.g. traumatic brain injury). Of the probable psychological vulnerabilities or risks in domestic violence perpetration, deficits in executive function may be the least explored. Using a subject heading search “executive function”, the PsycINFO database contains over 3600 journal articles, but only 3 when keyword “domestic violence” is added. Funds are requested to undertake a synthetic review of the literature on the intersection of executive function deficits and psychopathology as they are manifested in dysfunctional violent coping in domestic violence perpetrators. Products will include an article submitted for publication to a relevant peer-reviewed professional journal and at least one national-level professional conference.

Read More→

Categories : Grant News
Comments (0)

In an earlier post I talked about a book by psychologist Mack Hicks entitled The Digital Pandemic: Reestablishing Face-to-Face Contact in the Digital Age. I enjoyed Hicks’ book for two overarching reasons: 1) Hicks presents information concerning the analog–digital divide in a coherent and illuminating fashion, and, 2) Hicks has a lot to say on how EF or executive function will fare in the digital age (not good). If these topics are of interest to you then I highly recommend Hicks’ book.

On page 85, Hicks presents the reader with a table that succinctly summarizes the key characteristics that largely define the analog–digital divide. I so enjoyed this summary table that I contacted both Dr. Hicks and his publisher (New Horizon Press). I asked for and received permission from both to recreate this table for my blog readers. Here’s the permission notice:

Reprinted from The Digital Pandemic: Reestablishing Face-to-Face Contact in the Electronic Age by Mack R. Hicks, Ph.D. Copyright © 2010. Reprinted with permission of New Horizon Press. Permission given by the author and Dr. Dunphy—Publisher.

In this blog post I simply wish to present Dr. Hicks’ summary table for your consideration. Again, if this table piques your interest, grab a copy of The Digital Pandemic. To set the stage a bit, Hicks presents his table as a way of showing how screen and machine media use (left side of the table) will affect such analog things as face-to-face relationships and traditional forms of education (right side of the table). As the debate over how to improve schools and education rages on, I think it best to keep this type of summary table in mind. Enjoy – Rick

Read More→

Last week MSNBC ran a Public Service Announcement that featured anchor Melissa Harris-Perry. Here’s a quote from that PSA:

We have never invested as much in public education as we should have. We haven’t had a very collective notion of, these are our children. We have to break through our private idea that children belong to their parents, or children belong to their families, and recognize that children belong to whole communities. Once it’s everybody’s responsibility and not just the household’s, we start making better investments.

This PSA ignited a bit of a firestorm. Glenn Beck “eviscerated” the promo (as did other conservative pundits) while liberals defended it (see this New York Times Online blog for an example).

I found the MSNBC PSA interesting because it uses what cognitive linguist turned political commentator George Lakoff calls a “relief frame.” I’ll leave the political bickering to the pundits. In this blog post, I’d like to present a tale of three relief frames: child, nerd, and tax. I’m not an expert in cognitive framing. However, I’ve been a student of Lakoff’s work for some time now. In my amateur cognitive scientist opinion, the MSNBC PSA uses the frame of “child relief.”

Read More→

Categories : Comment
Comments (0)

Back in February, 2013, I wrote a two-part blog series entitled What’s So Social About Machine Media? In this blog series I mentioned a 2010 book by psychologist and social critic Dr. Mack Hicks entitled The Digital Pandemic—Reestablishing Face-to-Face Contact in the Electronic Age. In his book Hicks spends a lot of time talking about two overarching personality types: Gatherers and Hunters. Here’s how I described these two personality types in my blog series:

Throughout his book Hicks defines and describes two overarching personality types: Hunters and Gatherers. Simply, Gatherers are linear and left-brain oriented (e.g., comfortable with precision, certitude, and reliability); Hunters are holistic and right-brain oriented (e.g., comfortable with approximations, guesses, and hunches).

In my blog series I suggested that one can find an almost archetypal struggle between Hunters and Gatherers in the 1950s western movie Shane. As movie critics have pointed out, Shane is essentially a remake of the Cane and Abel story from the Old Testament. As mythologist Joseph Campbell often told his audiences, Abel was associated with sheep farming while Cane was associated with cattle herding. Simply, Abel was a Gatherer and Cane was a Hunter. Psychologist David Anderegg (in his book Nerds) describes Gatherers as people of thought, and Hunters as people of doing. Both Hicks and Anderegg suggest that President Obama embodies the Gatherer mindset with its focus on mental worlds, and the second President Bush would be a Hunter, a doer out in the physical world.

Read More→

Categories : Comment
Comments (0)

Robots, robots everywhere

by Jay Nelson
February 2013 issue of SWCP Portal
(reprinted with the kind permission of the author)

What follows is a reprint of an article by Jay Nelson that appeared in the February 2013 issue of Southwest Cyberport Portal Newsletter. Southwest Cyberport is the FHL Foundation’s IP or Internet provider. Their newsletter appears in our invoice statement each month. Given that SWCP is very much a digital technology company, I am impressed by how much they regularly write on such issues as how technology affects us not only as individuals but also as a society. The following article is just one example. I asked for (and received) permission to reprint this particular article because I myself have written extensively on what automation is doing to our society, especially our economy. In short, pundits (like economist Jeremy Rifkin, more on Rifkin below) regularly point to automation as a chief cause of our high levels of un- or underemployment. I am always heartened to see that others are also looking at this issue. When I called Jay, he told me that the TV news program 60 Minutes ran a piece on automation back in January, 2013. I did a Google search and, indeed, the title of the piece is, Are Robots Hurting Job Growth? Jay told me that the 60 Minutes piece offers up a more gloomy picture than the one he paints in his article. I’ll offer up a few additional gloomy observations of my own following this reprint of Jay’s article. For now, enjoy this reprint of Robots, Robots Everywhere. And thanks Jay. (My editorial comments will be in brackets.)

Read More→

You see or hear about these examples all the time—elephants, horses, dolphins, gorillas. But this YouTube example below is particularly profound in my opinion. I would suggest that this example points out why John Bowlby was so influenced by ethology (the study of animal behavior) as he developed his theory of attachment. Back in September of 2011, I noted that primatologist, Dario Maestripieri, writing in his book Primate Psychology tells us that Robert Hinde’s interest in …

… primate research was sparked by John Bowlby, who encouraged him to set up a colony of rhesus monkeys. In addition to training and supervising a whole generation of primate fieldworkers, Hinde had a great influence on primate behavior research with his own work on mother-infant relationships in rhesus macaques. … [F]or decades [Hinde] was one of the most articulate propoents of the conceptual integration between biological and psychological approaches to the study of behavior.

It’s too bad but most post-Bowlbians have all but forgotten the close connection between ethology and attachment theory. “What exactly created this split or separation?” you may well ask. Here’s what I wrote back in 2011:

Read More→

Student Must-Haves for Scholarship Success – Yahoo! News.

By Rachel Ny | U.S.News & World Report LPMon, Mar 4, 2013

Just a quick comment concerning the above article by Rachel Ny (which I viewed via Yahoo News) entitled Student Must-Haves for Scholarship Success. I focused on this article because I would suggest that it supports my claim (in earlier posts) that EF or executive function plays a large role in not only school preparedness but also school success.

According to Ny’s article, a group called NerdScholar conducted a survey to determine the ingredients needed for scholarship success. The results of the survey suggest that students will need three things:

  1. Transcripts
  2. Essays
  3. Letters of Reference

Transcripts are self-explanatory.

Now, here’s what the article says about essays:

Read More→

Categories : Comment
Comments (0)